US Rep. Mike Capuano reports the Federal Transit Administration has given tentative OK to the state's plans for cheaper stations and other reductions along the proposed Green Line extension from Lechmere into Somerville and Medford - but with a caveat that has to be addressed by year's end, or $1 billion in federal money could disappear and get spent in some other state:
The FTA has directed the MBTA to hire a team of qualified professional project managers and engineers to oversee the GLX BEFORE the FTA undertakes the last and most important step in their process - the risk analysis. When the project started, there were just two MBTA employees assigned a full-time oversight role. The FTA and the MBTA both agree that was insufficient. The MBTA has done some initial outreach to hire some qualified professionals but has not done so yet.
H/t Chris Devers.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Have Them Be At Porter Inbound at 7:49 Tomorrow Morning
By John Costello
Tue, 11/01/2016 - 6:24pm
Have them at McGrath and Highland at 5:38 tomorrow afternoon.
You will find that there is no real downside to GLX.
Have them also stand in the middle of Freetown or Acushnet anytime and ask to we really want to prioritize rail to The Cities of Sweatpants before bring a sensible and logical extension to the urban core transit system.
C'mon Charlie - Skip a few Holiday Parties for a State Rep from Worthington or Heath and get this done.
Good News & A Challenge
By Aeroguy
Tue, 11/01/2016 - 6:35pm
Obviously good news. But also a challenge to the T. Hiring capable managers has been slow, in part because of the low pay scale. A two-month deadline should focus their thoughts.
It wouldn't have anything to do with payscale...
By g
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 9:18am
It wouldn't have anything to do with payscale as these won't be project managers working for the T. They will be outside consultants/owner's reps.
No.
By Rob
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 3:46pm
No.
This would be in-house personnel to oversee consultants (and later contractors).
Even if they did something somewhat bizarre like hire another consultant to monitor the first consultant, they would still need in-house personnel.
T Disfunction
By Aeroguy
Tue, 11/01/2016 - 6:46pm
Breakdowns on the commuter rail and transit lines, which occur almost daily, are the most visible evidence of the T's disfunction.
But a briefing on the T's website on the administrative processes shows that it's disfunctional in that area as well.
http://www.mbta.com/uploadedfiles/About_the_T/Boar...
Examples:
* Different 'bargaining units' are on different payroll schedules -- some weekly
* Some people get paid by check
* Some people travel to 10 Park Plaza to collect their check in person
* There is a paper-based reconciliation process
Honestly, all of those things
By DTP
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 9:38am
Honestly, all of those things are also true of the billion-dollar multinational private firm that I work for. One division is paid weekly, the rest biweekly. The default option is still getting paid by check. Those people paid by check still get them in person.
I don't think any of those things are unusual or dysfunctional.
How many people ride the
By maria c
Tue, 11/01/2016 - 8:16pm
How many people ride the Orange Line? We're all hoping for help! We're not riding it. It is riding us.
non sequitur
By anon
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 11:52am
Although the GLX would relieve the orange line of people who now connect to buses that go where the GLX goes.
Placing Bets
By cybah
Tue, 11/01/2016 - 11:41pm
I'm taking bets to see that 1 billion disappear due to them not acting on it. I can see that lovely FMCB and Baker.. who really does not want this built.. dragging their feet like everything else they've been doing lately to prevent this from happening. I can just hear it now "oops sorry money ran out so we wont fund it at the state level so the GLX dies its final death"
Just watch. Capauno may be at the fed level but it takes Charlie and his boys to push it. They won't.. just watch.
Really, really, REALLY hoping
By anon
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 7:40am
Really, really, REALLY hoping you're wrong, but there's no way in hell I'd take that bet.
of course
By cybah
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 8:32am
I was talking facetiously about the bet. But I do hope I'm wrong.. but Baker and his team have made it pretty clear that they don't want this thing built nor spend the money to do so. He only has continued to move ahead with this out of sheer pressure from other politicians and people. But this may be the bullet he needs kill this project finally. Like I said, the conversation will go:
"oops, the federal money ran out and we won't fill in the gap with state money so the project is dead"
It really wouldn't surprise me at all.
Consulting the Pioneer Institute
By anon
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 10:03am
Waiting for his "friends" Charlie and Dave to tell him what to do to monkey wrench it.
Bet on Hiring
By Aeroguy
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 10:23am
My guess is that project managers from other state agencies are transferred to the T in order to meet the hiring deadline. The prototype might be Frank DiPaola, who transferred from Highway when Scott left as GM.
Baker et al CANNOT allow $1B of federal money to go away.
$1 billion is too much money
By anon
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 10:28am
$1 billion is too much money to waste on such a messed up organization. I ride the T, but I give up. Give it to some other transit authority that has their act together already.
This isn't the MBTA
By anon
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 11:53am
This is Charlie "Slash" Baker destroying the system.
This line is needed and is easy. JFBIA!
2 Full time employees?
By Mot
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 10:37am
Spending $2 BILLION+ and have only 2 full time employees doing oversight?
That's what happens when you
By anon
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 8:13am
That's what happens when you have years of people screaming about TOO MANY LAZY DO NOTHING EMPLOYEES SUCKING THE TEAT OF GOVERNMENT FIRE THEM ALL TOO MANY STAFF TRIM THE FAT STARVE THE BEAST
The union ensured none of those cuts were coming from the bottom tiers, and they really can't cut any maintenance staff anymore, so it all comes from management tier where it's already hard to keep good and talented people. Plus, eliminating a 90k/year job looks a lot better on the books than a 22k/year one.
Like most dysfunctional government agencies, lots of people at the bottom going on to get on, lots of politically connected / ladder climbing jerks at the very top, and a shortage of middle-grade people who have actual work to do.
But what about refusing more money??
By Kaz
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 11:57pm
What, oh what, could the MBTA possibly spend more money on? They just said they had nothing they could do if you gave them extra money. But they've constantly reduced/reconfigured/delayed this GLX project because they never had enough money!
Someone is a liar.
Add comment