Classic Boston thing: Guy in car veers towards guy in crosswalk, who swings at car with his umbrella. Only the guy in the car is an off-duty cop. Stephen Arlowe videoed what happened next.
Neighborhoods:
Free tagging:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
what is your source that he
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:50pm
what is your source that he WAS jay walking?? stick to the facts. we do not know whether or not he was jay walking.
And/And world
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:23pm
Given the configuration of that intersection, either:
The driver/thug was taking a prohibited right on red AND the pedestrian was jaywalking;
or
The driver/thug failed to yield to a pedestrian crossing with the light.
In either case, the motor vehicle operator was wrong.
I know
By bosguy22
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:38pm
Regardless, you can't get arrested for jaywalking.
Actually, however,
By mplo
Wed, 06/01/2016 - 10:38am
in some places one can get arrested for J-Walking. Some places have signs that specifically say "No Jay-Walking".
I'm not defending anyone
By PharmaGuy
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:31pm
I wasn't a whiteness, I just know the guy. I wanted to find out more and to check to see if he needed help and that he was okay. My update is posted below.
This is how to handle jaywalking
By Refugee
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:01pm
[youtube]lHjoEO_4x9M[/youtube]
the "old guy" in crosswalk vs. cop
By Jacqui Heinrich
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:55pm
You said you know this person-- we're trying to get in touch with him re: the crosswalk incident for Fox 25 News this evening. Can you call me at your earliest convenience? My cell is 781-375-7808, alternatively email is [email protected]. Hope to hear from you soon!!
Thank you....Please put this
By reader
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:44pm
Thank you....Please put this on TV...people need to know!
trying to get in contact
By Jacqui Heinrich
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:02pm
Hi there,
You mentioned you know the man who was detained in the video-- I'm a reporter with Fox 25 urgently trying to get in contact with him. Can you call me as soon as possible? Want to report this tonight at 10. Cell is 781-375-7808.
THANK YOU!!
-Jacqui Heinrich
Fox 25 has a big budget
By Boston_res
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 9:55pm
Give the video guy some cash for his video, he can donate it to the pedestrian's defense fund if he wants, also kick some cash to Adam for running Uhub.
Cops and Peds Don't Understand Ped signals
By Red
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 2:59pm
If the Ped signals had a steady (non-flashing) Don't Walk at a traffic light - then the pedestrian was illegally in the corsswalk. You do not have the right of way in a crosswalk at a traffic signal unless you have a WALK or FLASHING Don't Walk. At an unsignalized crosswalk - a vehicle is supposed to yield to a ped. But I have also spoken with police who complain that pedestrians are still in the crosswalk when it is flashing - well that is legal as that is called the pedestrian clearance interval to allow the ped to clear the crosswalk before on-coming traffic turns green. Bad enough when normal people don't understand these signals and the law and even worse when a cop does not know.
Tough to say who entered the crosswalk legally in this case (the turning car with a green arrow with a steady Don't Walk ped signal, or the ped with the flashing don't walk)
If a pedestrian is in a crosswalk …
By Ari O
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:51pm
you can't cut the pedestrian off:
nor shall any such operator enter a marked crosswalk while a pedestrian is crossing or until there is a sufficient space beyond the crosswalk to accommodate the vehicle he is operating, notwithstanding that a traffic control signal may indicate that vehicles may proceed.
Yes, but there's this as well...
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:02pm
A steady UPRAISED HAND (symbolizing DONT WALK) signal indication means that a pedestrian shall not enter the roadway in the direction of the signal indication.
it doesn't justify the driver's actions, but pedestrians cause a lot of problems. Try this in Manhattan and get run down.
now youre just being
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:34pm
now youre just being disingenuous.
You provided the link. the section you quote is referring to a motorsist passing another motorist that has stopped at crosswalk. You conveniently left out the beginning of the sentence:
"No driver of a vehicle shall pass any other vehicle which has stopped at a marked crosswalk to permit a pedestrian to cross, nor shall any such operator..."
reads a little differently now doesnt it?
here's the 1st sentence of the section:
"When traffic control signals are not in place or not in operation the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right of way..."
If BTD would just stop with the exclusive pedestrian phases, and went with concurrent like every other place on earth, maybe pedestrians and drivers would understand the laws a little clearer.
Thank you
By Marco
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:03pm
I am not defending this cop-without-a-badge (clearly an asshole) but I have yelled back at pedestrians before when they have a steady "DON'T WALK" signal and I have the green and start moving and then people start yelling at me. IF YOU HAVE A DON'T WALK SIGN THAT MEANS DON'T WALK. Should I just burn through red lights? walking through the crosswalk on those times is disturbing traffic. I can already smell all the driver -hate that's gonna come at me and I don't care. I do my best to obey the traffic laws, let people merge, let people turn, not blocking intersections, etc...and this really pisses me off. Those painted lines are not a Mario bros. star that makes you invincible. Some other asshole will run you down and the law just might side with them. 2+tons of metal vs. sack of bones= metal wins every, single, time.
Everyone be safe out there, and for the record, screw this cop. Roid rage from his scratched up Lincoln the taxpayers bought him....UGH
Way worse for cyclists
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:27pm
I have had numerous instances where I am proceeding straight ahead on my bike with a GREEN light, had pedestrasheep amble into an intersection against the light, then scream at me "don't run red lights" and mean it!
This is dangerous to the pedestrian when cars are coming, but it is dangerous to cyclists and the pedestrasheep when they step in front of cyclists.
It might help if they stopped asking google to text them a walk signal rather than look at the actual one in front of their faces.
Well... you may not bike
By anon
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 6:15am
Well... you may not bike through Boston very often since cyclists routinely blow through stop signs and red lights and many text while riding. It's way more dangerous for pedestrians than cyclists.
And
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 9:22am
So?
I bike through Boston all the time.
If I'm "running" a green light (aka "legally proceeding at exactly the time I should be"), oblivious jaywalking sheep straying into my path without lifting their faces from their phones and suddenly startled by my presence need to STFU.
Also, explain "way more dangerous for pedestrians"? I don't want to hit an idiot who can't look both ways because I will get hurt too. Or do you mean, yes, crossing against the light without bothering to look at the light OR oncoming traffic is very dangerous.
Pedestrians are not sheep. If
By anon
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 9:24am
Pedestrians are not sheep. If you hit a pedestrian with your bike or your car then your are hittiing a HUMAN BEING. If you have such aggression toward people who jaywalk then please stay FAR AWAY from areas in Boston and Cambridge with high concentrations of college students: for example: MIT, Northeastern, BU because these students will run out in front of oncoming traffic all day long. Huntington Ave. is the worst -- just yesterday while walking by Northeastern, in the span of only about 3 blocks, I saw several separate incidents of students (with books and backpacks that's how I deduced they were students) darting and other times strolling out into oncoming traffic which had a green light. They were not in a crosswalk. Yes, they were jaywalking. Fortunately, cars AND cyclists stopped quickly for them and no one got hurt. As a pedestrian, of course I think that's asinine and dangerous. HOWEVER, I have compassion for people navigating Boston and Cambridge (which is a disaster for people on foot due to the clueless tourist drivers) because I would NEVER want someone to be injured or have their head slammed to the pavement by a driver just because they were jaywalking. You really seem to have it out for pedestrians... I've seen this in several of your comments. Try walking in the city as your primary mode of transportation and you might have a little bit more understanding of what we go through day after day and year after year. Remember, we live here. You are just a visitor from the 'burbs.
I apologise to the sheep then
By SwirlyGrrl
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 9:42am
Sheep don't have "smart" phones and are generally more aware of their surroundings than the pedestrian who decides to cross against the light without bothering to look for traffic and RECKLESSLY ENDANGERS THE LIFE OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING WHO IS RIDING A BIKE.
Walk signal vs. Don't Walk signal doesn't matter
By GoSoxGo
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:41pm
Especially in this city. A walk signal should mean the pedestrian has a protected right of way. Of course, in Boston, a traffic signal can have a green ball for a driver to go straight or turn right, even if the walk signal is illuminated. I've even seen intersections with a green right arrow, while the walk signal is illuminated. This should never happen, but does.
If a traffic signal is green in the direction the pedestrian is headed, the pedestrian is allowed to cross, and a driver must legally yield to the pedestrian, even if the Don't Walk sign is illuminated or flashing.
As we all know, a number of walk signal buttons are malfunctioning. The pedestrian would be waiting forever, since the walk sign NEVER illuminates.
I walk and take the bus in the city, so I see this dozens of times every day. The 5,000 pound vehicle should yield to the pedestrian at all crosswalks, even unmarked crosswalks (basically every intersection).
Of course, I hate the people who dart out in the middle of the street without looking (or not caring) just like the next guy, but you still can't hit them.
That is outrageous.
By DPM
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:03pm
That is outrageous. Cop belongs in jail.
What will it take?
By Rob O
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:35pm
We (rightfully) get so upset by this stuff, but then are told it's "being investigated" or some other such bullshit. Everyone calms down with the passage of time. The officer gets a mark in his file or has to undergo some training (if that). No jail. There's no outrage over the lack of criminal prosecution because we've forgotten about it.
Repeat.
I think it's time to set up a database where citizens can easily track the progress of these incidents. Maybe if there was more continuing attention, there would be more pressure to do something about the abuses.
For example
By Rob O
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:15pm
What ever became of our infamous Uber-stealing Michael Doherty? He was indicted over a year ago.
Found guilty? Sentence? What of his employment with the Boston Police?
Yeah, we'll never know
By Boston_res
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 9:57pm
Unless someone pays into the Public Request fund for the responsible city agency.
Nothing will happen to this
By anon
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 10:33am
Nothing will happen to this cop just like most of the other cops that supposely get into trouble. Slap on the wrist. What a joke!
NY
By Saul
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:16pm
Must be related to the thugs at the NYPD who arrested a mailman after nearly running him over as well.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/nyregion/glen-gr...
Welcome to walking in the
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:16pm
Welcome to walking in the city of Boston! I used to yell or flip off people who blew through stops/reds while I was in the crosswalk, but after seeing this video I don't dare do even that. Disturbing video.
On the bright side
By erik g
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:17pm
the lawsuit against the roid raging asshole cop is going to let this guy retire early.
On the down side:
1. We all get to pay for it, and the cop will hang out on paid administrative leave while the department "investigates" and then determines that there was no wrongdoing.
2. If not for the guy with the camera, the pedestrian would currently be in jail on a bunch of trumped charges.
Let's all jump to conclusions
By Bronx rd
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:27pm
Let's all jump to conclusions on a video that starts halfway into an incident . That makes sense .. Who cares the incident started over someone maliciously damaging someone else's property over a traffic infraction we aren't sure even happened.
Well
By bosguy22
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:40pm
I didn't see any damage in the video, did you?
The cop said the man hit his window while he was driving through the crosswalk. If the man was close enough to hit is window, the cop should have yielded to the pedestrian, even if he didn't have a walk sign.
From the victim
By PharmaGuy
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:29pm
I talked to the poor guy who was roughed up. The police are basically sticking together on his one and refuting all whiteness testimony but have decided to "let him go" and everyone should just walk away quietly. I think that's the outcome but we may find out more because WBZ is getting involved. I'm just glad my friend is safe. I always wanted to believe in the police since I know so many officers and I trust them but after seeing this it sickens me to think that anyone I know could be put into this situation.
There are two sides to every story...
By zetag
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:32pm
what the police say happened, and what actually happened. I've seen enough cops lie and cover each other's tracks to not believe a single word that they say or write in a police report unless it is on video.
Repressed racism
By Refugee
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:43pm
Autocorrect jumping to conclusions again?
No it's appropriating
By bulgingbuick
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:01pm
the movement...of keys.
Autocorrect privilege...
By PharmaGuy
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 4:42pm
I should check it.
"Let Him Go"????
By APB
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 8:27pm
What charges were they considering bringing against the pedestrian? Assault and battery with an umbrella smudge? Resisting head-banging on cement by refusing to bleed? Failure to lose consciousness while being dragged by the collar?
He did absolutely nothing illegal.
And we have to wonder what else the police did to him to make him "admit" to jaywalking.
I generally think the BPD is exemplary, but it's still important to weed out bad apples and we just saw one give a bravura performance on camera.
I commend the guy who filmed it and asked those questions.
serve and protect?
By CRD
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 3:51pm
even if the man was crossing against the signal, the cop should have slowed and let him go. not to excuse the ped's irreverence (if he cross against the light) but seriously, that officer has anger issues and should not have a badge, certainly not a gun or a vehicle.
I mean Boston people are
By DPM
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:04pm
I mean Boston people are pretty terrible about walk signals. It is one of the few ways NYC is better than Boston. In NYC nobody is going to stop for you.
(not excusing the cop just a tangent)
In NYC
By bshep
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:58pm
In NYC you know you're reliably going to get a walk signal pretty quickly at every intersection, so you wait for it. In Boston there are too many intersections where you wait forever before you get the walk signal, and in some cases it never comes. Not excusing jaywalking, but if the lights worked better for pedestrians it would be less tempting.
Charles Circle
By Saul
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:02pm
Outside the Liberty Hotel, while crossing from the Longfellow, is a perfect example: the walk light turns as just as the light for drivers going to Storrow westbound turns red. Of course there are usually at least five drivers who are still going through the intersection, and by the time it's clear for pedestrians to cross, the walk signal has already started flashing red.
Yes!
By BostonDog
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:35pm
Walk signals are a joke in Boston. They are almost impossible to use as designed: Too short, not sync'd with other lights, and often blocked by drivers anyway.
I swear
By SwirlyGrrl
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:31pm
When Motohead Mahhhty took office, every pedestrian signal in the central city was shortened by 15 seconds.
There is a really stupid one at West and Tremont that takes forever to trigger, even though the traffic stopped at Boylston is stacking up past that point, yet there is little traffic behind. Why they can't hold that traffic on Tremont and West, not pack it up at Boylston, and double the frequency of that light is beyond logic, considering there are far more pedestrians than motorists in that area at many hours of the day.
The absolute worst one by far
By PeyoteEatingWat...
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 9:04pm
The absolute worst one by far is the left turn light when you turn northbound on Adams from eastbound Gallivan in Dorchester. It literally lasts all of five seconds.
Furthermore, if you actually
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:17pm
Furthermore, if you actually get a walk signal (ha!) after pushing the button, your time is cut in half thanks to all of the cars running the red. In Boston, you then SPRINT across the street since at this point you've only got about 3 seconds before the flashing orange hand appears. Meanwhile across the river, Cantabrigians are gifted with a leisurly 50 seconds or more affording them the option to walk, twirl or even cartwheel across the street.
"Right On Red" is a major problem also
By anon
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 10:25pm
Not only are pedestrian walk signals absurdly short, they are cut even shorter at intersections because all the cars waiting to turn right on red immediately do so, prohibiting the pedestrian who has the walk sign from crossing. The cars turning right on red are supposed to yield to pedestrians but they seldom do. By the time all the cars have turned right, the time for the pedestrian to cross has passed, the light for cars has turned green again and the whole vicious cycle starts again.
The other day, I tapped on a guy's window
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:07pm
I and others were crossing in a crosswalk, with a Walk signal, and this guy was still trying to go through a red, but slowly moving through the crosswalk. He was literally almost running over my toes, and wasn't stopping, so I tapped on his window and yelled "stop!". He smiled and was saying something I couldn't hear, in a very sheepish/apologetic fashion, and he kept rolling through the crosswalk.
Lucky for me he wasn't a psycho, or either I would've gotten my ass kicked by him, or I would've pinned him until the police arrived, and then risked getting my ass kicked by a whole gang of his friends.
I too have hit cars with
By Metoo
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 10:43pm
I too have hit cars with umbrellas that did not stop for me on the crosswalk and almost hit me. Mostly on West Broadway in Southie. I like to think that the noise will startle them as much as they startled me when I felt the breeze of their car flying by me.
Same thing last summer in Medford
By GeeJimmy
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:17pm
Anyone remember the overreacting off-duty cop in Medford who did something similar last summer? He ended up resigning rather than face a disciplinary hearing. http://www.wcvb.com/news/medford-officer-stephen-l...
I hope the City of Boston investigates this one thoroughly.
law in simple language
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:36pm
Site outlines law for all 50 states. Pedestrian crossing is at a light (crosswalk with signal), uncontrolled crosswalk is without a signal.
http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/pedest...
"Massachusetts: Vehicles must yield the right-of-way to pedestrians within a marked crosswalk that are upon the half of the roadway upon which the vehicle is traveling, or when a pedestrian is approaching within ten feet of where the vehicle is traveling. Vehicles may not enter a marked crosswalk when a pedestrian is crossing until there is sufficient space to accommodate the vehicle beyond the crosswalk. Pedestrians must cross a roadway within a marked crosswalk when there is an officer directing traffic, a traffic control signal, or a marked crosswalk within 300 feet of the pedestrian. Pedestrians may not suddenly leave the curb and enter a crosswalk into the path of a moving vehicle that is so close the vehicle is unable to yield. Pedestrians crossing a roadway in an urban area outside of a marked crosswalk must yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway. It is unlawful for any person to actuate a pedestrian control signal or to enter a marked crosswalk unless a crossing of the roadway is intended."
The only way the pedestrian could be at fault once he was in the crosswalk would be if he didn't give the copy room to yield. Since he hit the driver side (left side) of the car, he was in lane 2 of that street, meaning he was already in the crosswalk when the cop decided to turn right. Pedestrian had the right of way.
That man is an example of
By Patricia
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 4:41pm
That man is an example of patience. He kept his emotions in check which will only make the cop look worse.
I wish I could say I would've remained as calm.
The guy filming is not annoying
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:03pm
We need more like him. When perps are cops, and other cops subscribe to the childish blue wall of silence philosophy, video is often the only way to get justice.
I look forward to reading about the results of a successful lawsuit.
It adds insult to injury
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:14pm
that he is being roughed up by an off duty cop that can't even dress like an adult. I apologize if he just came from batting practice.
How do you get close enough
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:40pm
How do you get close enough to someone walking in a crosswalk with your car for the pedestrian to hit your rear driver's window with a closed compact umbrella? It's too bad that supposed cop who throughout the video continues to fail to identify himself didn't think through his version of the story first. Interestingly his license plate is in the video so I'm guessing the powers that be will soon be able to identify him.
what are the odds that...
By bastiat
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:17pm
...the cop used his turn signal?
Thank goodness for the video taper
By not verified
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:59pm
The very worst BPD has to offer.
So next time a big,
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:29pm
So next time a big, aggressive dude tries to attack me, I should ask if he's a cop before defending myself?
I'd wager anything that about
By Brent Jeffries
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 7:17pm
I'd wager anything that about a half dozen security and traffic cameras recorded the whole incident at the intersection. I hope the guy's lawyers get a copy before the cops get to them and suddenly "none of the cameras were working."
BPD investigating
By adamg
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 8:00pm
WCVB reports.
only because it was taped
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 10:25pm
With so many cop cars and cops called to the scene, they could have taken witnesses info right then but didn't. Only after the news media saw it on UHub and reported it themselves was it investigated. They were hoping to intimidate the guy by magnanimously not charging him for jaywalking (no charges for the cop not yielding),hitting the car with the umbrella (no damage and not yielding - the impact could have been due to the car almost hitting the ped), or resisting arrest (can't be arrested by road rage assholes, just cops who have badges or ID themselves, and you have to ID yourself BEFORE you tackle someone and slam their head into the concrete twice). Unfortunately, I predict no charges for battery against the cop.
I am so
By Kathode
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 8:10pm
upset by this. What a fucking bully. I hope he loses his job. There is no reason for that sort of treatment.
Totally.
By Sally
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 10:52pm
He really blew it, and from the get go he looks so sheepish, like he knows he's being a total dick. It's like watching Bluto rough up Ed Begley.
Lucky for the cop
By Cantabrigian
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 8:51pm
The road rage cop is lucky an on-duty officer didn't see him slamming the victim's head into the ground. He could've very easily have been shot by the uniformed police.
Road Rage?
By Arthur
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 10:03am
At no time in the video does the cop appear to be in a rage.
OMG Arthur. You have got to
By anon
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 9:09pm
OMG Arthur. You have got to be kidding. Hauling him by his collar like that shows plenty of rage.
OMG
By Arthur
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 10:55pm
He never punched him from what I can see in the video. Never slammed his head down as the videographer alleges. What would you do if somebody hit your car with an object and ran away?
wondering if the cop expects to be let through regardless
By anon
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 10:12pm
Pedestrians are supposed to yield to emergency vehicles, even in cross walks - this guy is probably expecting to always go through, even when no one knows he's a cop. He has that attitude - why did you run? (because I thought you were a crazy stranger trying to beat me up?).
I was pulled over once at 11 pm in Labor Day traffic for not getting out of the left lane for a state police car near Albany. It was dark, I had no idea it was a cop, and it was bumper to bumper in both lanes (in the 90's - they've added a lane since then) so moving into the right lane would involve cutting people off - dangerous in that traffic. I thought it was just an aggressive asshole riding my bumper until the bubble lights lit up - yeah, we all want to be moving faster douche! It wasn't as if I was moving slower than the rest of traffic in my lane. Moved immediately once the lights came up and people let me into the right lane. He pulled me over right after I yielded.
The cop was so mad he was spitting - I actually was afraid he'd hit me (a young woman at the time). I just kept repeating the I had no idea he was a cop until he flashed his bubble lights and then I yielded immediately. He yelled for a while but really couldn't charge me with anything because it was the truth. Yelled at me a LOT more then left - pulled someone else over before I could even get back into the stream of traffic so someone else "payed" for me not respecting his authoritay. REALLY obeyed the laws until I crossed back into MA after that.
He felt entitled for me to yield upon his mere presence, even though I didn't know it was a cop. Same thing with this guy - never mind he's in an unmarked car dressed like a bat boy. In this case, the guy actually was beat up.
Be careful!
By karenz
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 1:10am
I had a similar experience with a cop in NY - glad it ended quickly and you got out of there! You might consider downloading an app to grab any video in case you need it: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/users/201...
It is your legal right
By anon
Thu, 05/26/2016 - 1:21am
To call 911 and give them your location and ask for a marked and uniformed cop before you speak or get out of the car.
It's important for women to know because cops have been known to pull women over and rape them. Or cop imposters.
Having watched the video
By Waquiot
Wed, 05/25/2016 - 10:38pm
Yeah, the cop is probably in the wrong by chasing the guy down and shoving him onto the ground, but I didn't see what happened at the beginning. And, watching the video, neither did the guy who filmed it. He even says so, then he starts going on about what had happened after saying he didn't see it.
Pages
Add comment