Dear friends interested in the Urban Renewal Plan extension issue,
As you know, the City Council (despite having lost its power to vote on extensions) voted on March 23 to approve the BRA's requested 6-year extension for the 14 expiring Urban Renewal Plans. 2016. The BRA can get a seventh year as a "minor modification" without Council approval, as it got an eleventh year for the current extension. This will no doubt be followed by another lengthy extension.
In UR Plan areas, the BRA can exercise certain municipal powers (blight-finding, eminent domain taking, re-zoning) with no public accountability, political or legal. That is the exact purpose of UR Plans -- not "planning" (the BRA changes the Plans to suit each developer) but unfettered power over development, directed behind the scenes by the mayor, without political or legal recourse for the citizens. UR Plans cover 3,000 acres of the center city, making up 10% of the total land area of Boston. The Plans were meant to deprive the Plan area -- many thousands of residents, businesses and property owners -- of the rule of law and democratic governance enjoyed by the rest of the city. That is why the Plans, which were always intended to end after 40 years and have already been extended, should now be allowed to expire as the law provides, on April 30, 2016.
The state Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) is the last step in the approval process.
DHCD can't consider anything the Council didn't vote to approve, but DCHD isn't statutorily bound to approve what the Council approves. That is, Council approval is a prerequisite for DHCD consideration, but DHCD can make its own decision after its own consideration.
Section 48 of Chapter 121B, the enabling law for the urban renewal plans and agencies (BRA), states the following:
The state Department of Housing and Community Development may hold a public hearing upon any urban renewal plan submitted to it, and shall do so if requested in writing within ten days after submission of the plan by the urban renewal agency, the mayor or city council of the city or selectmen of the town in which the proposed project is located, or twenty-five or more taxable inhabitants of such city or town.
Although Ch 121B doesn't specifically address Plan modifications, I would argue that we can interpret this to allow for the same hearing provision to apply to any Major Modification of the Plans, which includes extensions of their duration. The Urban Renewal Regulations state the following:
(2) A major plan change is a significant change in any of the basic elements of a previously approved Urban Renewal Plan. The request for a major plan change shall be accompanied by evidence of a public hearing, a Planning Board determination that the proposed change is in conformance with the general plan for the community as a whole, City Council or Town Selectmen approval, and evidence that all affected redevelopers have been notified of the plan change, have been given an opportunity to comment, and that any such comments have been considered. If deemed necessary for its decision, the Department may request additional local approvals or information.
Community people at the hearings and public meetings were generally against this extension -- even the people whom the BRA is mis-quoting as wanting more urban renewal. I think if 25 city taxpayers or more write a request for a public hearing, we could at least show the DHCD that while the Council voted yes, it does not reflect the will of the community.
I've drafted a letter asking for a public hearing, attached.
Are any of you interested in signing on to this letter? There's no legal action involved here, just a letter asking for a public hearing.
If I get at least 25 "taxable inhabitants of the city" responding to sign on -- and I hope I'll get many more! -- I'll email it to DHCD and we'll see if we can have a voice at the state level.
The letter has to be sent within 10 days of DHCD receipt of the Council-approved vote, which has not yet happened. I'll be checking in at DHCD to find out when it does.
So please email your signature authorization (with your real name and your neighborhood)) asap to [email protected]. On request, I will send you a Powerpoint presentation that explains the BRA in general and this issue in specific.
Or you can send your request directly to [email protected] Just drop me an email telling me you did, so I can know how many signatures we have.
Shirley
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 61.84 KB |
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Please sign if you are a Boston resident
By Stevil
Fri, 04/01/2016 - 4:46pm
If you have been out on Uhub for any length of time, you have read about how the BRA has been used to circumvent the law, destroy neighborhoods without accountability and literally deprive city coffers of money that truly belongs to us. From the destruction of the West End decades ago to the most recent corporate tax welfare schemes for some of the wealthiest corporations on the planet, the BRA and their complicit powerbrokers are behind it all. Please send Shirley your name, email and neighborhood and help her put a stop to the damage this agency continues to perpetrate on our city!
I second what Stevil has posted.
By Boston_res
Fri, 04/01/2016 - 5:07pm
I also recommend keeping in mind which councillors voted FOR this and vote for SOMEONE ELSE next election.
How do you find out how our
By Anonymousy
Fri, 04/01/2016 - 8:04pm
How do you find out how our elected officials voted on this?
Lucky for us, Adam posted it.
By Boston_res
Fri, 04/01/2016 - 11:11pm
The only three who voted against it were: Josh Zakim, Tito Jackson and Ayanna Pressley.
https://www.universalhub.com/2016/council-approved...
Who voted against the Urban Renewal Plan extension?
By Shirleykressel
Sat, 04/02/2016 - 11:23am
Only Councilors Tito Jackson, Ayanna Pressley, and Josh Zakim voted against. All the rest, including those from whom we expected better -- Michelle Wu, Matt O'Malley, and Annissa Essaibi-George -- voted for it. Remember!
You can watch two of the Council's public "working sessions" (recorded at my request) at
http://www.cityofboston.gov/citycouncil/cc_video_l...
http://www.cityofboston.gov/citycouncil/cc_video_l...
You can watch the public hearing at
http://www.cityofboston.gov/citycouncil/cc_video_l...
You can see the vote take place at the March 23 Council meeting (starting at 17:22), where only Tito Jackson stood up to speak against the extension:
http://www.cityofboston.gov/citycouncil/cc_video_l...
There are no video recordings of the 3 (or 4?) City Council "briefing sessions" where the BRA brazenly lied to the Councilors for two hours.
There are no video recordings of the dozen public meetings and the innumerable "stakeholder outreach" meetings where the BRA brazenly lied to everyone else for a year.
Extension powers
By Cantabrigian
Fri, 04/01/2016 - 11:14pm
Can someone explain this worked?
they are willing to risk court challenges
By Stevil
Sat, 04/02/2016 - 12:47am
At least according to Shirley, the council agreed to give up their extension powers 10+ years ago as part of their deal to extend UR in 2004/2005. However, they have decided to ignore that and risk a lawsuit so they just took the vote. Shirley is not a lawyer so maybe they will get away with it. However, she's damned thorough so my guess is we are looking at a suit and potentially an injunction against using UR powers until this is settled. It's going to get interesting.
Shirley is known for doing her homework....
By Bob Leponge
Sat, 04/02/2016 - 1:50pm
Shirley Kressel is known for doing her homework. If even 0.5% of the public took the same time and effort she does, to be informed and to advocate for good government, we could have an awesome government.
How the Council signed away its powers over UR Plan extensions
By Shirleykressel
Sat, 04/02/2016 - 3:49pm
I've replied with a new post on the home page, so I could attach some relevant documents.
If any lawyer out there would like to have a little free, anonymous conversation with me on legal options, please email me! Confidential, no "representation" involved, no "legal advice," just a friendly e-chat to help a non-lawyer landscape architect trying to get a little "rule of law" for Boston...
DHCD Hearing 4/22
By NFB
Fri, 04/22/2016 - 9:57am
Does anyone know how I would be able to see the hearing that is today at 10:00 online? Is it streaming? or will it be recorded to watch some place? Thanks.
DHCD hearing was not streamed or video-recorded
By skressel
Fri, 04/22/2016 - 2:36pm
But it was transcribed. I'll file a Public Record Request for the transcript and post it.
Add comment