A Cambridge college student and a Salem video-game designer are among seven people who have sued to block a new government policy that only allows passports to have gender designed as "M" or "F."
In their suit, filed this week in US District Court in Boston, the seven charge that the change, among the first announced by Elon Musk's co-president last month, in an executive order in which he could not even bring himself to use the words "egg" and "sperm," violates their rights to equal treatment, right to travel, privacy and freedom of speech and is an "arbitrary and capricious violation of the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
Until Jan. 21, Americans had the right to chose among "M," "F," and "X" as their designated passport gender, with X reserved for people who did not want to chose one of the first.
The plaintiffs say this not only violates the rights of transgender, intersex and nonbinary citizens, it puts them at potential danger for travel to countries that, at least until Jan. 21, were less forgiving of gender differences - and can cause problems even in the US or Canada for passport holders who identify and present as one way but are marked another. One of the plaintiffs charges they've already gotten a passport where the government changed their gender preference to what the government wanted.
Bella Boe is the pseudonym of a woman who became a college student in Cambridge last year:
Bella is currently known only as female to her family, to staff and peers at her school, and in her communities in New Jersey and Cambridge. She had hoped to travel to England as part of her studies:
When Bella travels and interacts with government officials, they perceive her as a female. This is not only affirming for Bella, it keeps her safe.Â
Bella's most recent passport, which she received in 2021, has a female sex designation. She sent her passport in for renewal on January 23, 2025, to ensure that her current passport would remain usable for as long as possible. Having a female sex designation on her passport affords Bella safety and reassurance while traveling. She is terrified that, under the Passport Policy, she will no longer be able to travel safely.
Bella would feel uncomfortable traveling with a passport that inaccurately stated a male sex designation. Not only would this reflect an attempt to erase who she is, it would be confusing for government officials who would otherwise identify her as female based on her gender expression and invite additional, stressful scrutiny. Bella does not want her passport to out her as transgender every time she uses it, especially when traveling outside of the United States in countries that are not accepting of transgender people.
Sawyer Soe is the pseudonym of a Salem resident:
Sawyer is a nonbinary person. Their sex assigned at birth was female, but they do not identify with a binary sex. The term "nonbinary" accurately captures their identity.Â
Sawyer has lived as a nonbinary person in all aspects of their life since 2019. They have always known their gender identity to some degree, as they are naturally an androgynous person and that is typically how others perceive them. Today, Sawyer is fully themselves at work and among friends and family.
Sawyer was able to obtain a Massachusetts driver's license with an "X" sex designation in July of 2023, and this has allowed them to navigate travel and daily interactions safely and comfortably. Having an "X" sex designation on their identity documents allows them to escape the arbitrary enforcement of an identity projected on them solely based on their sex assigned at birth. The "X" designation provides Sawyer with freedom and privacy that allows them to exist in a way that is free of a label that they did not choose for themselves and that is inconsistent with how they live.
Sawyer has not been able to update their United States passport, which expired in 2019, in a similar manner. This was not something Sawyer sought to do during the earlier days of the COVID-19 pandemic that occurred soon after the passport's expiration because Sawyer did not travel then. Recently, Sawyer has begun traveling more. Sawyer's design team at work is planning an on-site collaboration with their colleagues in Canada, and Sawyer will be required to travel internationally to Canada within the next three months, and potentially several more times in the coming year.
 Sawyer would feel safer if they had an "X" sex designation on their passport because it would be consistent with their identity, it would protect their privacy as it would prevent disclosure of their sex assigned at birth to strangers, and it would match the other identity documents that they currently carry. Due to the Passport Policy, Sawyer will no longer be able to obtain an "X" sex designation on their passport that accurately reflects who they are, how they express their identity, and how others perceive them.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
The State Department was
By c. sparks
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 1:43pm
The State Department was dragged kicking and screaming into offering X markers in the first place. It was in contempt of court during three different Presidential administrations -- two of them Democratic -- after Zzyym v. Kerry (later recaptioned to Zzyym v. Tillerson, Zzyym v. Pompeo, and finally Zzyym v. Blinken) was decided.
Hopefully justice is served slightly more quickly in this case.
(Aside: this is a good
By c. sparks
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 1:44pm
(Aside: this is a good headline, and appreciated.)
Not helpful
By Ben
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 2:11pm
Are they the last to recognize that helping Republicans win makes their lives worse?
so help me out
By lbb
Mon, 02/10/2025 - 1:02pm
How are "they" "helping Republicans win"? By existing?
link?
By Vicki
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 2:33pm
Hi Adam,
Â
Do you have a link for another source for this story, or should I point people back to UHub?
Source is attached
By BostonDog
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 3:25pm
It's the legal filing attached to the story. One of the many great journalistic things about Uhub is providing the actual document so people can read for themselves.
Thanks
By adamg
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 6:11pm
I get a feed of every single document filed in federal court in Boston. 99.99% are totally mundane and not newsworthy (setting of hearing dates and the like), but obviously it's worth scanning for new cases and decisions.
That's the part I didn't know
By Vicki
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 9:05pm
That's the part I didn't know. Thanks for the info.
Passport insanity
By Angry Dan
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 4:30pm
If anyone cares to visit https://www.reddit.com/r/Passports/ you'll encounter plenty of trans people trying to figure out how or if they can get or renew their passports or safely travel across US borders.
So it wasn’t just about
By Anon
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 4:53pm
So it wasn’t just about republicans love of women’s college sports. Surprise. Why do republicans care so much about this and get so riled up with hate about anyone who’s different than them?
Because they suck
By Will LaTulippe
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 6:35pm
And aren't willing to admit it, so they declare war on others.
Convenient Scapegoat
By SwirlyGrrl
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 9:54pm
Classic fascist bullshit aimed at people too non-numerous to fight back.
What infuriates me is that these assholes deny the existence of/throw intergender people under the bus. There are people who are biologically X and they were born that way. It makes no sense for someone born ambiguous to be "assigned" a gender.
For Chrissake...
By necturus
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 6:57pm
...if you're going to sue the government, sue them for bypassing the constitution, gutting critical departments, and throwing tens of thousands of federal employees out of work.Â
My girlfriend is worried about a friend of hers who's worried not just about losing his job but his pension too.
But this gender bullshit? Fifty years from now, historians will note it as a major distraction that kept Americans from noticing the abolition of their democracy.
This take is bad
By Miss_M
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 7:24pm
And you should feel bad about it.
Stopping me from leaving the
By c. sparks
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 9:19pm
Stopping me from leaving the country is not a goddamned distraction.
Learn some biology, please
By SwirlyGrrl
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 9:55pm
There are numerous mutations, chromosomal polymorphisms, and other biological determinants of gender that do not result in a binary phenotypic situation.
Even if people weren't trans, we would still have this binary gender bullshit making people's lives more difficult than they need be.
But all of this matters for people not being killed, dear.Â
What does that have to do
By anon
Sun, 02/09/2025 - 12:42am
What does that have to do with trans people? Are you saying that allowing passports to have an X gender, or a gender that differs from what’s on the person’s birth certificate, is only required because there are people with a mutation or chromosomal polymorphism?
It's not a distraction
By anon
Sun, 02/09/2025 - 9:18am
This is the symptom, not the cause.
so, work on one of those issues
By Vicki
Sun, 02/09/2025 - 3:06pm
How about you support one or more of the organizations that have already filed lawsuits about the issues you want to prioritize?
If everyone shrugged and told them sure, banish trans people from public life, and take away their rights and their medical care, the bigots wouldn't stop there. They'd start shouting more about the next scapegoats, including cisgender LGB people, Jews, and immigrants.Â
Â
US passports have a box for sex, not gender
By robo
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 8:51pm
If you can self identify your sex, which I don’t think you can do, just remove that box and everyone will be happy? Probably not, but it’s worth a try.
with other biometrics, no need for a sex designation
By deselby
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 11:30pm
The purpose of a passport is to provide an accurate identification of a person at a foreign or US border. That's it. Â
Sex designation really doesn't add much since I've never heard of anyone other than a suspected drug smuggler having to disrobe at a border.
Facial recognition technology available to governments is scarily accurate. The chip in your passport incorporates all the identifying information about you, which you can be questioned about. Like the familiar banking ID questions - "which of the following model cars have you owned," etc. Â
and a sex designation really doesn't mean anything if governments allow people to designate themselves as one sex while having the genitalia of the opposite sex - i.e. there hasn't been a legal requirement you have to go through the operations. Â
so they should do away with sex designations altogether. Â
Should have quite while you were ahead
By Transphobia Watch
Mon, 02/10/2025 - 12:57pm
You are correct that there is no reason to have a sex or gender designation on most things that contain one.
My organization frequently does trainings for state agencies and community groups on updating forms to comply with Massachusetts trans-inclusion laws and to reflect best practices. For most things, we recommend just leaving the field off. If they are required to report binary sex to a federal agency, best practice is to have a blank line for describing one's gender, then state that federal funding unfortunately requires them to collect binary sex and have those checkboxes (and you can still have a "decline to state" option). Since they have to include the boxes, the acknowledgement and the open-ended gender line let queer people know it's a space that's at least attempted to train their folks on inclusion. Some state agencies that receive federal funding like DESE do have students register using the Massachusetts M/F/X designations and just report the data as collected and figure the feds can deal.
People are pretty stuck on the practice of collecting sex/gender info for casual settings that don't remotely require this and will ask "but if we just take it off, how will we know what gender the person coming to art class is?" You don't need to know anyone's gender to teach them art at your town's recreation center. You might add pronouns to your form so you know how to refer to them.
If we're talking about physical descriptors, assumed binary gender doesn't really help locate someone, and legal sex certainly doesn't, and I have no idea what your obsession with trans people's genitals is or what it has to do with passports. In the case of a passport, it has a photo. All it really needs is height and maybe eye color.
It's not bullshit
By Angry Dan
Sat, 02/08/2025 - 9:13pm
Pretty sure that anyone who doesn't have their head buried in the sand is aware by now and the targeting of trans people along with many others are not distractions. If you're limiting your support to just a friend of a friend who may be on Musk's list and you expect others to stand there and take the hit then you are part of the problem.
I know plenty of people who are at risk from this administration right now for all kinds of unjustified reasons and they all deserve support. The whole point of this blitzkrieg is to knock everything and everyone out before people can organize a defense. Also, make sure to join your unions if you are lucky enough to have them. They're already taking this administration to court.
For Identification an X doesn't cut it
By StillFromDorchester
Sun, 02/09/2025 - 3:31am
It doesn't say gender it says sex, no?Â
A passport is not supposed to make you feel better about yourself, it's for identification.
Â
Photo ID
By Angry Dan
Sun, 02/09/2025 - 8:34am
The passport photo is for identification. Customs should not be examining your sexual organs, at least not yet.
Presentation more important for ID
By Just walkin'
Sun, 02/09/2025 - 9:33am
If the purpose of the passport is for identification, labeling a person a male that has presented as a woman their entire lives impedes visual identification. Same is true for people who present in a way unaligned with binary sexual classification.
Allowing this extra option impacts no one else in any negative way. It is strictly punitive to take it away.
Labeling a person an X
By StillFromDorchester
Sun, 02/09/2025 - 6:00pm
Serves what purpose for identification? Â
Don't assume
By lbb
Mon, 02/10/2025 - 1:57pm
Putting "X" on an ID is perhaps a way of saying "don't assume what this person SHOULD look like" to the individual doing the checking.
Add comment